Enterprise Connect: Winning at the Game Of CIOs

I’ve probably been to 50 tech conferences in my career. So things have to be pretty….different in order to surprise me. So the failed keynote demos I witnessed at Enterprise Connect 2013 didn’t shock me, nor did the shirt that Microsoft’s Derek Burney donned for his Lync keynote.

One thing that WAS new to me was the Mock Request for Proposal (RFP) sessions at Enterprise Connect. Geared for CIOs and other IT buyers who make up a huge proportion of the 5,000 Enterprise Connect attendees, these sessions simulate the process of enterprises putting out a bid for a new collaboration deployment or service, and let multiple vendors put their best technical and financial feet forward. To rip off a favorite TV show of mine, let’s call it the Game of CIOs.

Despite being 3 hours long each, the RFP sessions were all well-attended. TCO+whiz bang technology – what more can an IT buyer ask for? For in lieu of reading the actual bids submitted to another CIO, this is as detailed and realistic as it gets.

There were three RFPs that vendors could participate in:

·Deploy an all-new IP telephony on-premises solution, including Unified Communications (UC) and collaboration, to 2,000 employees today, eventually growing to 4,000 workers

·Deploy UC via the cloud to the same number of employees;

·Deploy UC on-premises WHILE keeping the existing PBX system (not of your own choosing), also to the same number of employees.

Each Mock RFP was organized and judged by a well-known independent consultant or industry analyst: David Stein, Brent Kelly (read his blog about the Mock RFPs here) and Marty Parker (read his blog here). All of the top vendors participated with the exception of Microsoft.

Avaya placed very well in each of the RFP competitions. In the first Mock RFP, in the scenario in which companies deployed voice and UC to all of its users, the Avaya Aura-based solution running in virtualization on top of VMware beat eight other competitors, including Cisco, Alcatel, Shoretel, Siemens, NEC, Aastra, ININ and Mitel with a score of 96.5 out of 100.

According to Rob McMaher, a Consulting System Engineer at Avaya, Avaya’s winning design featured Avaya Aura Conferencing 7 with Flare Experience and Client Enablement Services to allow employees to get UC on their mobile devices. Avaya’s bid also included Avaya Aura Contact Center for 70 customer service agents, supported by virtualized dual servers running other Aura components such as Communication Manager and Session Manager in a low-cost, reliable virtualized configuration. Also, the electrical efficiency of the Avaya phones and audio conferencing gear – which have all earned the Class 1 Power green certification – helped.

In the Cloud UC competition, Avaya placed in the top 3 out of 7 competitors for features and functions. Where Avaya stood apart was its 99.999% high availability and value. Out of the four financial measures – total cost including capital expenditures and operational expenditures, one-time capital costs, recurring 5-year capital and operational expenditures and recurring cost month/user – Avaya placed first.

The final competition – deploying UC on top of existing PBX systems – was key. Many companies are looking to gain the benefits of collaboration without dumping perfectly operational PBX boxes or well-running, heavily-used telephones, as some vendors would prefer that you do. According to McMaher, Avaya submitted a bid running our Unified Comms and Collaboration solution, including advanced features such as One-X Mobility (softphones for smartphones and PCs) to Avaya Flare Experience with AAC7 conferencing, on top of a legacy Cisco CUCM 4.x telephony switch. Avaya ended up outscoring Cisco 86.06 to 82.99.

Avaya’s strong showing for both its technology and cost shouldn’t be surprising. Avaya ranks number one in many communications and collaboration markets, including global enterprise telephony (Dell ‘Oro), global unified communications (Dell ‘Oro), global unified messaging (T3i Group), global contact centers (Gartner), global fixed-mobile convergence (Frost & Sullivan) and global voice maintenance services (IntelliCom Analytics).

Meanwhile, several recently-published independent reports by well-regarded analyst firms – Constellation Research and Nemertes Research – both came to the same conclusion, that Avaya offered some of the best bang for the buck for enterprises today. The Nemertes report (get it here) by Robin Gareiss surveyed hundreds of enterprise IT managers on their actual, real-world costs from deploying IP telephony from various vendors. Avaya Aura cost less than half of Microsoft Lync.

Constellation’s Brent Kelly (download here)  focused on the total cost of video conferencing, taking into account
not just list software prices, but, crucially, the amount of network bandwidth you’d need to buy to support the same number of users. Avaya Scopia turns out to be more efficient, due to its codecs and its distributed architecture, meaning that its TCO is far lower than most rivals, especially Cisco.

The moral? If you’re interested in technology and value, you could do far worse than to take a look at what Avaya has on offer.

 

Related Articles:

What Smart Analysts Think About Microsoft's Lync Telephony Claims

black telephone handset disconnected.jpg

The big brains at UCStrategies had a very relevant podcast last week. Ten of the Unified Communication industry’s leading independent analysts weighed in on Microsoft’s recent claim that its Lync unified communications suite was “leading” in shipments of enterprise voice/telephony software.

Microsoft appears to be basing its claim on shipments of Lync voice, but doesn’t say much more. As a result, “there’s a lot of debate and discussion” about what Lync voice shipments actually mean, says UCStrategies analyst and podcast moderator Blair Pleasant. “Are they paid licenses, free licenses that customers get from enterprise CALs (client access licenses), (voice) seats actually being used and deployed, or (numbers) just out there because companies have Lync [suite]?”

One thing’s for sure: when you go by the tried-and-tested methodology of tracking the number of phone lines actually being deployed to users today, Microsoft isn’t on top according to any of the analyst firms. Indeed, according to one of the most respected market watchers, analyst Alan Weckel of the Dell ‘Oro Group, Avaya is actually number one in enterprise voice. My colleague Enzo Signore pointed this out in a blog several weeks ago – before the UCStrategies podcast.

There were too many opinions in UCStrategies’ 38-minute podcast to neatly summarize. Not all of them agreed with each other, of course. But here are the quotes that particularly stood out for me:

Blair Pleasant: “I personally have some issues with these numbers and what they mean…I don’t think it’s fair to say that Microsoft is a leader in enterprise voice at this point. Again, they’re doing gangbusters, but they’re still a niche player. And the companies I speak with aren’t rushing out to deploy Lync voice.

Marty Parker: “I think [Blair] you’re exactly right, that any claim like this should be greeted initially with some serious skepticism…Microsoft, pretty uniquely among the leaders, sells licenses far ahead of deployments. The number of licenses can be 2x or more what is actually being deployed. The deployment reports we’ve seen from a number of sources put Microsoft in the 5% range in terms of actual deployments for FY12. If you extrapolate from that 6-7% for FY13, and then double that, you get 13%…That is a number that wouldn’t stand up when someone goes out to use a rigorous approach to market share data. Maybe for shipments, but it doesn’t reflect reality on the ground.

Dave Michels: “I see a lot of firms deploying Lync. I don’t see a lot of firms deploying Lync voice…I also know from other observations that Microsoft is pretty shady about their numbers. A lot of other firms are very open. Microsoft is very secretive about this stuff. They don’t put a lot of detail behind this…It’s a whole different level of open-ness you don’t see with Microsoft.

Jim Burton: “When I was in debate in school, my Bible was a book called ‘Lying with Facts and Figures.’ I don’t think he [Microsoft blogger] lied, but the way he presented it was a bit of a misrepresentation, if you understood all of the facts.”

Roberta Fox: “It really wasn’t til late 2012 where Microsoft was considered for telephony or even desktop video. They really were not seen as reliable or credible telecom solutions from enterprise clients as replacements for their PBXes, due to concerns about reliability, availability and the feature set. Another interesting thought: there was very little interest in Lync for desktop video applications.”

I encourage you all to take a listen to this podcast.

How Mediocre Customer Service Is Driving Your Customers Away

Some companies drive away loads of customers with one big move. Like that department store chain that got rid of coupons and sales promotions. Its base of cost-sensitive mom shoppers quickly fled to other stores

For most companies, losing customers is a slow, inexorable process, that looks more like this:

kitchen faucet dripping water.jpg

What’s the cause? In many cases, it’s weak customer service. Most companies over-spend on customer acquisition and under-invest on keeping existing customers happy. The result is statistics like this from Forrester Research:

Slide16.JPG
There are many reasons why your customer service may be leaving customers less than thrilled. Customers are more diverse than before, for one:
Slide8.JPG
Technology has also made customers more independent – and demanding. They want to be served right here, right now. 
Problem is that most companies, even if they talk the multi-channel talk, fail to walk the walk. Beyond voice, they may have deployed 1-2 additional ways for their agents to deal with customers. Turns out, there are a dozen channels besides voice that your customer may want – nay, demand – to be able to reach you on. Also, companies trying to deploy new contact center channels will, how can I be polite about this, often do it BADLY.
Do these problems sound familiar at all? Are they ones you want to solve? If so, you might consider attending the next Avaya Customer Experience webinar, ‘Where Did All of my Customers Go (and How Do I Win Them Back?)’
Broadcasting this Thursday Nov. 7 at 11 am PT (2 pm ET), it features a mix of experts in this area, including:
– Sheila McGee-Smith, independent customer experience analyst;
– Tony Bridgewater, Executive General Manager, Technology & Products, for Australian system integrator, Salmat;
– Mark Wilson, CMO for Avaya;
– Jeanne Bliss, our moderator, who writes and consults on customer experience and is a former Chief Customer Officer at multiple companies; 
Attendees to the webinar get a print copy of the book, Managing the Customer Experience, mailed to them.

Who's the Real Number One in Business Telephony?

The telephone is far from dead. You know who still loves to call people? Family members, close friends and…the Pope. No joke: 76-year-old Pope Francis has startled a quite a few strangers with a call from a Vatican landline in which he simply announces, “It’s the Pope.” It’s happened to enough people that the Corriere della Sera, a leading newspaper in my native Italy, published a front-page article offering tips on how to make small talk if His Holiness calls (tip #1: talk about soccer).

You know who else loves the telephone? Businesspeople. Unified Communications may be a diverse, ever-growing set of tools and technologies, but the channel that started it all still plays a central role. It’s why there’s a never-ending stream of articles advising how to schmooze colleagues on the phone, how to run your phone meetings, how to close sales deals on the phone, how to ace telephone job interviews, etc. The stakes are high, which is why telephony remains such a hotly-contested market.

Last week, Microsoft put out a blog claiming it is “now shipping more enterprise telephone lines than any other technology company in the world.” It was a bold claim. So bold that longtime industry expert, Eric Krapf of No Jitter, felt compelled to investigate. One respected market watcher, Infonetics’ Diane Myers, told Krapf that her own research – which shows Cisco and Avaya neck-and-neck far above other rivals in telephony – made her “struggle” with Microsoft’s claims. When Krapf confronted Microsoft’s spokespeople, they admitted that Redmond’s claim to have shipped the most telephony lines was based on different data, revenue. As anyone familiar with software bundling knows, revenue alone can paint a deceptive picture.

However, revenue COMBINED with other data CAN be illuminating. While Microsoft and Cisco bicker, they are ignoring what’s really going on in the voice market. According to the well-known telecom market research firm, the Dell’Oro Group, Avaya passed Cisco in Q2 this year in telephony according to two key metrics. First, powered by growth in our small and midsized UC solution, IP Office, the number of telephone lines Avaya shipped grew 10% quarter/quarter to 1.8 million, while Cisco’s slipped for the 3rd-straight quarter, according to Dell’Oro:

dell oro total pbx shipments.JPG

Source: Dell’Oro Group

As a result, Avaya had a commanding lead of the global enterprise telephony market by revenue, both for Q2 2013:

Dell'Oro Global Enterprise Telephony Systems Q213 Rev Share.JPG

 

Actually, Avaya led Cisco by the same margin for all of calendar year 2012, too:

 

Dell'Oro Global Enterprise Telephony CY12 Rev Share.JPG

 

How come Microsoft’s nowhere to be found? We asked Alan Weckel, Vice President, Enterprise Telephony & Ethernet Switch Market Research at Dell’Oro and author of the report, who “confirmed that Dell’Oro Group does track Microsoft in the report. While Dell’Oro group does not break out Microsoft call control directly, based on the size of the remaining market, Microsoft would not be amongst the largest vendors on the charts.”

Why is Avaya gaining telephone users and increasing sales revenue? For a number of reasons:

1)The rock-solid quality of our flagship Avaya Aura platform (read how billion-dollar real estate firm Forest City Enterprises virtualized Avaya Aura software onto VMware and cut costs and increased reliability);

2)The cutting-edge advances in the Aura platform, including the new Collaboration Environment platform to enable developers to quickly build communications apps, and the Avaya Messaging Service that finally brings texting into the enterprise world (and supports any vendor’s system, even Cisco);

3)The quality and cost-competitiveness of Avaya IP Office;

4)The increasing attractiveness of IP Office 9.0 to the fast-growing mid-market segment;

Importantly, we see many customers that use the Microsoft Lync solution for IM and presence turning to Avaya for voice. Rather than deploying Lync software all the way or integrating with Cisco, hundreds of enterprises are trusting the Avaya Client Applications (ACA) plug-in, which offers scalability, ‘Five 9s’ of high-availability, technical features such as open call control, protection for your other communication investments, and tight integration with our contact center solution, which happens to be number one in the market according to Gartner.

Related article: Avaya’s New Wireless LAN 9100 Mutes the Sucking Sound of Network Downtime

ACA is not a tactical solution, either. Providing a comprehensive, open alternative for customers who wish to avoid vendor lock-in is part of the Avaya long-term strategy. Simply put, we want to be the best Lync integrator in the industry.

Lync software undoubtedly excels at IM and presence. But as Cisco Collaboration chief Rowan Trollope pointed out last week, IM and presence are last decade’s news. The future is things like enterprise-friendly text messaging (like Avaya Messaging Service) and open collaboration platforms that let businesses pick the best technologies for their needs.

So when you’re thinking about your UC solution, don’t think it’s only about Lync software vs. Cisco vs. Avaya. The telephone isn’t going away anytime soon. And if telephony is important to your business, the right solution might very well be a combination of a Lync client and Avaya.